Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Friday, May 22, 2009
PETERSON POSTS AS "THEDOCTOR2001"
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
Thursday, May 21, 2009
APPEALS FROM ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUDICIAL FRAUD AND CORRUPTION
JACK N. PETERSON HOSTILE AND EVASIVE ABOUT SCAM O.R. 569/875
PETERSON TALKED TO BRIGHAM MOORE:
LEE COUNTY SCAM O.R. 569/875
PETERSON CONCEDES HE DOESN’T KNOW
IF LEE COUNTY SCAM O.R. 569/875 IS “VALID”
THE EMINENT DOMAIN ATTORNEYS AT BRIGHAM MOORE:
“My conversation with Mr. Peterson revealed that he has a great deal of animosity towards you [Appellant Dr. Busse]. Interestingly, he wouldn’t come out and say that he believes Lee County owns the accreted area between your lot line and the Gulf of Mexico. Rather, he said that you [Dr. Busse] have no legitimate claim to the accreted land, as your lot is “a quarter of a mile inland.” He [Jack N. Peterson] said he doesn’t know whether the 1969 [sham] resolution is valid, and that more study is necessary before anybody can safely claim to own the property. Overall, his legal stance regarding the ownership issue was softer than I expected.”
Here, Peterson conspired to conceal that in 1998, Lee County had removed and eliminated any “cloud” by said fraudulent “claim” of uncertain “undesignated/unidentified areas” pursuant to 1998 Lee County Blue Sheet 980206 and O.R. 569/875.
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
AFTER WEEKS OF DELAY 11TH CIRCUIT FILES JUDICIAL/CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS
U.S. ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT DISGRACED JUDGE LAZZARA
TELL THE NEW YORK TIMES ABOUT SCAM O.R.569/875
Send your letters to the Editor:
The New York Times
Office of the Public Editor
Information about letter submissions can be found at: http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/lettertoeditor.html
Send Op-ed submissions to:
Information about Op-Ed submissions can be found at: http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/opedsubmit.html
See also the New York Times Blogs:
SAMUEL B. KENT AND JOHN E. STEELE IN INTERNATIONAL MEDIA
11th CIRCUIT SENDS APPELLANTS' BRIEF TO U.S. ATTORNEY RHODES
CORRUPT JUDGE TJOFLAT CONSPIRES TO EXTEND SCAM O.R. 569/875
1. Defendant corrupt U.S. 11th Circuit Court Judge Gerald Bard Tjoflat [“Tjoflat”] conspired with the Defendant-Appellees to conceal that said eminent domain scam O.R.569/875 falsely “claimed” that “undesignated areas” “appeared” on the 1912 Subdivision Plat of Survey. See said extortion-scheme O.R. 569/875; ¶ 2.
2. Defendant Tjoflat conspired to conceal the prima facie invalidity of said fraudulent “claim” of uncertain “undesignated areas”, which Tjoflat knew did not appear on said Plat. See 1912 Plat in Lee County Plat Book 3, p. 25.
3. Tjoflat conspired to conceal that Lee County had never executed said “claim” of fictitious un-platted “undesignated areas”. See said scam O.R. 569/875.
4. Tjoflat conspired to conceal the platted designated 60’ wide street. See said 1912 Plat.
5. Tjoflat conspired to extend Lee County fraud-scheme O.R. 569/875.
6. Tjoflat conspired to obstruct justice, deliberately deprive, and defraud the Appellants by falsely pretending the said scam O.R.569/875 was a “legislative act”.
7. Tjoflat conspired to conceal that the platted Cayo Costa Subdivision had never been dedicated and that Lee County had never accepted any dedication.
8. Tjoflat conspired to conceal that no witnesses and/or seal appeared on said sham “claim” of uncertain “lands”.
9. Tjofalt conspired to conceal that no legislator and/or legislative history could be identified in said scam O.R. 569/875.
10. Tjoflat conspired to conceal that Lee County never had any legislative authority or purpose to fraudulently ”claim all of raid lands and accretions thereto”, which admittedly could not be “identified”. See eminent domain fraud-scheme O.R. 569/875.
11. Tjoflat conspired to conceal that admittedly unexecuted scam O.R. 569/875 contained multiple different type fonts and errors such as, e.g., “raid lands”; “tho County”; “there’ ”.
12. Tjoflat conspired to conceal that admittedly and indisputably unexecuted and unsigned Lee County fraud-scheme O.R. 569/875 was never adopted.
13. Tjoflat conspired to conceal that Defendant-Appellees’, State of Florida, sham “claim”/”defense” of adverse possession of the uncertain “undesignated areas” was a scam in order to deliberately deprive and defraud the Appellants.
Friday, May 15, 2009
DAVID P RHODES TO DISCLOSE FRAUD-SCHEME O.R.569/875:
CAPLES v. TALIAFERRO PRECEDENT
U.S. ATTORNEY DAVID P RHODES AND FRAUD-SCHEME O.R.569/875
LEE COUNTY EXTORTION-SCHEME O.R. 569/875: